This HostForLIFEASP.NET vs Vidahost comparison is made for you who are looking for a more cost-effective and faster hosting solution between these two options. After all, both of these two web hosts are famous and trustworthy hosting providers in UK that have been in this industry for a long period of time and have been serving for a large number of websites all over the world. In this case, for those who have not experienced with them, making a right decision might be a hard task. In the following, we have personally tried their services, started the real-world monitoring and collected the reviews of real customers, aiming to showcase their pros and cons to help you pick one that suits your needs the best.
Windows Shared Hosting Comparison in UK
HostForLIFE is using industry-standard web environments with the latest stable technologies like Server 2012, Internet Information Services 8, SQL 2012, ASP.NET 3.5 SP1, ASP.NET 4, ASP.NET 4.5.1, ASP.NET 4.5.2, ASP.NET 4.6 and ASP.NET 5. Using powerful Dell servers that are beefy enough to service the requirements of their customers. Their servers use 64 bit software, are dual quad-core, have at least 16 GB RAM, and have RAID 10 disk arrays. They don’t skimp on their servers because they believe you deserve better.
Unlike other hosts, they do not force you to register for their long term contract. You can choose between their 4 hosting cycles, i.e. Quarterly, Half-Yearly, Yearly and Two/Three-Yearly Cycle. They want you to can get your web presence up and running without a huge upfront investment. Certainly, if you register for their long-term hosting plan, they will reward you fairly and appropriately.
Vidahost is part of Paragon Internet Group and they run some of the UK’s best known internet companies. Their group is led and owned by the same technical team, and together they have some impressive statistics and clients. All of their directors have extensive industry experience and a passion to improve. If something can be made faster or more efficient, they’ll do it – whether that means a kernel patch, a tweak to a piece of software, or a simple configuration change.
They use and implement a wide range of technologies, including: various Linux distributions, Solaris, Microsoft Windows; PHP, ASP, ASP.NET, perl, lots of shell scripts; MySQL and MS SQL; Xen, Cisco IOS and more. They also believe in using freely available software wherever possible allowing us to easily add features, tweak software and fix bugs for their clients, allowing them to provide products tailored to their clients’ requirements without waiting on third party vendors or requiring complex workarounds. Their hosting is 100% Carbon Neutral, their emergency support is 24/7/365, and they have been going strong since 2004.
After collecting their real customer reviews all over the world, they made an overall comparison as below:
Windows Shared Hosting Performance
After reviewing and comparing their hosting services, we have found that both of them have done great in terms of hosting reliability, claiming to guarantee at least 99.9% uptime for all the hosted websites. To achieve this goal, they all adopt quality web servers and cutting-edge data centers. To figure out whether this 99.9% uptime can come into truth, we have hosted two identical sample sites with them and have monitored their uptime since the beginning of August. According to the result, both of them do not disappoint us.
As compared with many other web hosting solutions available on the web, both HostForLIFEASP.NET and Vidahost offer affordable Windows ASP.NET 4.5 hosting service with beneficial discount. If they have to pick the cheaper one, HostForLIFEASP.NET wins little over Vidahost. Check the detailed price in the following picture:
Both of the 2 web hosts provide the money back guarantee to ensure risk-free and worry-free purchase.
Although HostForLIFEASP.NET attaches great importance on their technical support by offering live chat and email system, it seems that this company encourages their users to ask for help via their live-chat, support ticket and email. Their experienced and well-educated technical staffs are capable of solving any issues you come across. There is no extra charge for support. In addition, the two companies keep updating rich resources in their knowledgebases to help users solve their problems, which helps earn them a high customer satisfaction rate.
According to this comparison, both of these two web hosts are quality and reliable Windows shared hosting providers. When comparing intensively, however, HostForLIFEASP.NET is undoubtedly the better option by offering a more cost-effective hosting solution and better hosting performance.